John Orr

Entrepreneurial Management

Miki — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:06:37 -0500

MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP RESOURCE

Entrepreneurial Management

(John Orr, Center for Religion and Civic Culture, University of Southern California, 2004)

A large, socially active African-American congregation[1] has formed an economic development corporation whose mission is to infuse new economic energy into the area’s low income neighborhoods. The corporation’s signature program, which enjoys a well-deserved national reputation, focuses on entrepreneur training—the empowerment of “creative and driven entrepreneurs.”

Thus, it is not surprising that this group’s welfare-to-work program also adopts an entrepreneurial management style to implement its publicly-funded job training and job placement activities—activities that are directed toward the region’s hardest-to-employ welfare recipients. “We run our program as if we were entrepreneurs,” one of the welfare-to-work staff members reported. “That’s what I like. I know what I have to do….” When you are clear about your management style, she suggested, you have a solid framework for making day-to-day decisions. You know the spirit in which you should be addressing problems and considering opportunities

Here are some elements in the welfare-to-work program’s entrepreneurial management style:

Getting more out of a dollar. When hardest-to-employ welfare recipients—especially women--began to confront time limits, program administrators knew that they had to expand their outreach. Unless they took on the challenge of serving additional people in this group, many would be pushed into the streets. But administrators quickly discovered that the state’s financial climate made it virtually impossible to raise the program’s funding level. With static resources but an expanded client base, “we just started stretching the dollar,” explained a staffer. “We were funded…something like $700 a client….But we stretched the dollar.”

To do so, the organization turned to other public and private agencies for pro bono services. For example, the organization decided that it would use other agencies to provide support services that otherwise would be provided in-house, such as family violence intervention, English-as-a-Second-Language, and transportation. This strategy greatly increased the program’s resources and reduced the number of services that individual staff members were providing for each participant.

Nonetheless, the program’s staff ultimately had to confront the fact that it could “stretch the dollar” only so far. The staff discovered, for example, that it could make its $700-per-client allocation work for four clients, but no more. “We had to turn a lot of people away because we just could not serve them,” the program director said. “But we didn’t turn them away empty-handed. We contacted other agencies that we knew had funding for similar programs. We sent [participants] there….We even gave them a transportation allotment to get there. In some cases, we drove them there. And we did what we had to do because, to be quite frank, even when you stretch a dollar, there’s only so far you can stretch it.”

Using marketing strategies. Drawing on techniques taught in an entrepreneurship program that is conducted by the program’s congregational sponsor, the welfare-to-work program devises marketing strategies that are directed toward its own population of participants, potential participants, corporations who will serve as employers, and other public and private human service agencies. Each of these markets requires a different approach, administrators believe. Some, for example, may be efficiently reached through the use of the region’s media, including neighborhood newspapers, radio stations, and public service television programming. Others may require labor-intense sales relationships, for example, “selling” corporations on the value of employing welfare-to-work participants and assuring them that the program will stand behind its graduates. Collaborating agencies may require collegial telephone and e-mail conversations that nurture trusting day-to-day relationships. Above all, strategies should be based on clarity concerning what it is that the program wants and/or needs in its relationships with various markets. The program should be clear about the content of its messages that are directed to each of the populations it targets.

· Working with a results-oriented mentality. The welfare-to-work program enthusiastically embraces performance-based objectives and the utilization of performance indicators. Many of these indicators are specified in the contract the program has negotiated with its sponsoring public agency. Program staff collect data related to these indicators. These include such things as: numbers of participants; numbers of referrals to other agencies; numbers and kinds of services provided to participants by staff members; numbers of job placements achieved; numbers of post-employment contacts with participants and employers; data related to the longevity of participants’ employment; numbers of cooperating agencies; and numbers of cooperating corporations. The program matches these objectives and indicators to its mission statement. Members of the staff use these data to formulate changes in the program’s services and strategies. The emphasis is on hitting the targets, rather than on process.

· Assuring the availability of services that are required to fulfill the program’s mission. Participants often require specialized support services that the program is not prepared to offer. To meet this need, administrators have created a network of cooperating public and private agencies. Transportation services, for instance, are provided when participants encounter barriers.

· Encouraging a problem-solving culture within the program’s staff. The program encourages participants and staff members to identify problems and to suggest possible solutions. Staff meetings are designed to nurture a problem-solving culture. Strategic changes are often formulated from the bottom up. “We trust our staff people to tell us what the problems are,” a program administrator observed. “In a lot of cases, they have good ideas about what the solutions should be. We should pay attention.” On one occasion, for example, a staff member reported that participants often did not show up at other social service agencies to which they had been referred. “It’s a big problem,” she argued. “And we sometimes don’t realize what’s going on.” After a lengthy discussion, the staff decided to be more aggressive in offering transportation services. It would also see how far it could go in providing “desks” on its own premises for other agencies to provide services.

The staff of the welfare-to-work program clearly has concluded that it does not have to choose between an entrepreneurial business style and a faith-centered style. Program administrators, in fact, say that their clients, cooperating corporations, and cooperating public and private agencies trust them mainly because their program’s strategies embody their church’s faith vision.

If you are interested in adopting an entrepreneurial management style, here are some first steps:

· Clearly identify the “business” you are in. Clarify your mission, and then create indicators that will help you know whether or not you are succeeding. Adopt a bottom line mentality. Be sure that you are getting the most for your dollar in accomplishing your mission. For help, go to http://home.americanexpress.com/home/mt_personal.shtml.

· Decide how your program’s faith-orientation will be expressed in and through your services. Don’t leave this policy to chance or to moment-to-moment decisions by staff members. If your program is funded by a government agency, take into account regulations related to how faith may be expressed in the program and by staff in working with participants. In this area as well, develop indicators that will help you know whether or not your faith-orientation policy is being implemented.

· Within your mission, be clear about the services that your organization can offer. If you need more services than your organization alone can offer to achieve your goals, aggressively create a network of partners whose organizational goals overlap yours. Be relentless in maintaining communication with these partners.

· Employ staff members who are talented and imaginative. Encourage them to be problem-solvers and to envision new possibilities for your enterprise. Make sure that staff meetings are structured to allow leadership to emerge, for example by encouraging staff to develop solutions to challenges the program is facing.

· Create a marketing plan that concretely guides how you will reach out to potential participants, to cooperating public and private agencies, and to your own sponsoring organization. Be disciplined in implementing this plan. Be willing to change directions when it is clear that your plan is not working.

Remember that you are not turning your back on your faith commitments when you decide to adopt an entrepreneurial management style. Faith and entrepreneurial management styles can complement each other.

_______________________________________________________________

This is part of a series of Thumbnail Case Studies authored by the FASTEN research team and released by Baylor University School of Social Work as part of a 30-month research project funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts. This project is designed to identify the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in addressing problems of urban poverty. Baylor is leading this project with researchers from Baylor University’s business school, the schools of social work at the University of Pittsburgh and Virginia Commonwealth University, and the Center for Religion and Civic Culture at the University of Southern California.

A team of researchers from these four universities have interviewed various stakeholders from fifteen (15) promising faith-based programs in four United States cities. This ends the data collection portion of Phase I of a grounded theory research project in which participants, board members, administrators, program coordinators, and collaborators in these fifteen programs have been interviewed face-to-face.

The findings of this first phase will be the foundation for a quantitative national survey designed to determine the extent to which the grounded theory that emerges in the project’s first phase can be applied nationally across the diversity of faith-based social services in the United States. Sagamore Institute’s Faith in Communities program and the Center for Faith and Service of the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC), Baylor’s partners in this project, are disseminating the findings of this research through the creation of the Faith & Service Technical Education Network (FASTEN).

This essay represents some of the findings from the FASTEN research project that are relevant to the planning and delivery of services by faith-based organizations. The piece was authored by John Orr (with the Center for Religion and Civic Culture at the University of Southern California) with the FASTEN Research Team. He can be reached at jorr [at] usc [dot] edu.

[1] The name and location of the congregation has been omitted in order to protect its privacy as a participant in the FASTEN research project.

Related Articles
	A Community Organizing Approach to Micro-enterprise Education and Job Training

Related Books
	A Guide to Mapping and Mobilizing the Economic Capacities of Local Residents
	A Guide to Mapping Local Business Assets and Mobilizing Local Business Capacities

Related Links
	The Asset-Based Community Development Institute

	News
	Conference Calendar
	Forum
	Find Others
	Ask a Specialist

Public/Private Teaming

Miki — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:31:43 -0500

PUBLIC/PRIVATE RESOURCE

Public/Private Teaming

(John Orr, Center for Religion and Civic Culture at the Universityof Southern California, 2004.)

At a recent meeting of Los Angeles County human services representatives, the county’s Chief Executive Officer announced that it was one of his highest priorities to encourage cooperative relations among public and private human service organizations. Clearly in this count, public agencies—even those without a track record in working with community-based groups--are experiencing political pressures to be more collaborative. As a result, public/private teaming is becoming increasingly common. Public agencies are working with private agencies--including faith-based organizations—to provide coordinated support services for low-income participants. Faith leaders and agency personnel regularly communicate and view each other as day-to-day allies. Indeed, public/private teaming with faith-based organizations is becoming almost routine in Los Angeles. And it’s been successful.

Recruiting Foster Parents

A collaboration between a Christian nonprofit agency and the Children’s Bureau of South California (a nonprofit that works under a county contract), for example, is addressing the “crisis-level” shortage in foster and adoptive families in the county. “It’s very difficult to recruit foster parents,” a spokesperson for the Children’s Bureau, says. “Very difficult. The number of foster parents is declining, and it’s hard to find them.”

The Christian nonprofit, however, has had remarkable success in recruiting foster and adoptive parents within the county’s faith communities. Using a small staff and many volunteers, this organization makes presentations in Catholic and Protestant worship services. It invites interested families to consider whether foster and adoptive parenting might become their “ministry” or their “calling.”

When families indicate interest in foster and adoptive parenting, the Christian nonprofit connects them with agencies that interpret what is involved in their potential commitment. Then the Children’s Bureau, working as the certified agent of the county, offers training related to the legal side of foster and adoptive parenthood. It also leads recruits through licensure procedures.

Throughout the whole process, the Christian nonprofit cultivates close, day-to-day relationships with public agency personnel. “We don’t make decisions where the children will live. We don’t place the children,” the Christian nonprofit’s director observes. “So we have to have a real good relationship with the powers to be, like the social workers.”

When families receive their foster or adoptive children, the Christian nonprofit offers a peer support network. It surrounds the families with continuing education opportunities, friendship, advice, prayer, and legal information.

Empowering Latino Immigrants

Another partnership in the County is preparing Latino immigrants to participate in the region’s mainstream economy through an innovative job training and micro-enterprise program. The program engages participants in street vending--a commercial activity that is familiar in their countries-of-origin. It then provides the knowledge and skills through which street vending can become a bridge to other small business enterprises.

The program engages several partners. The Universityof Southern California, a private university, provides the micro-enterprise education. City agencies and departments provide technical assistance and training for the street vendors. The program also cooperates with the Los Angeles Police Department around issues related to law enforcement in the park where the vendors operate. The mayor’s office is also involved, having made the vendors program a part of the overall community development plan for the area. All the organizations included in this public/private team have a visible stake in the program’s success. Each depends on the others.

Free Health Care in South L.A.

In South Los Angeles, a partnership between a Muslim student association and the Schoolof Medicineat one of the region’s largest public universities has made possible the only free medical clinic providing health services for low-income community residents.

The clinic got launched when a local Congressman assisted the Muslim student association in locating facilities and in securing funding from city agencies and departments. Faculty members, residents, and interns from two university-based schools of medicine (one public, one private), and from regional hospitals, provide the bulk of professional services. Medical quality assurance is provided by members of the universities’ faculties and by members of the free clinic’s board.

Medical services at the free clinic are available to all comers—all ethnicities, all races, all religious traditions. Muslim symbols, however, are prominently displayed. A tapestry hanging on one wall, for example, quotes the Koran: “God does not change the condition of a people until they change the condition of their own souls.”

The clinic is, in every aspect of its work, a public/private team. And all team members are enjoying a win-win situation. The schools of medicine and hospitals gain a well-managed, free clinic in an urban setting for their student interns and residents. City departments and agencies secure services for a low-income, medically underserved region. The sponsoring Muslim student association successfully models Islam’s commitment to compassion and justice. It also displays Islam’s eagerness to provide leadership in Los Angeles’s array of faith-based human services.

Tips on Public/Private Teaming

Sometimes public/private teaming programs like these depend on publicly-funded contracts. But, with or without public funding, they require informal ties, nurtured through many, many phone calls, e-mails, and committee meetings. “Constant communication--that’s important,” says the director of the free clinic. “Make sure that there is a constant exchange of information….”

When teaming appears to be a reasonable strategy, go for it! Teaming makes sense when, working together, each one of the team’s organizations increases its capacity to fulfill its mission or to secure its organizational interests.

Here are some tips about how best to become more involved in public/private teaming:

Identify which public and private agencies have programs that complement what your own. This takes work, because—at least in many cities—there are very few up-to-date sources of information about the human service programs being offered by public and private agencies. Try searching for information on the internet since many agencies have internet sites. Select an internet search engine (e.g., www.google.com), and type in the name of your service and the name of your city. Or, try some phone networking, using a branching technique. Start with one agency whose services complement yours. Ask an administrator in this agency to recommend others that you might contact. Then keep branching out.
Once you have identified some potential partners, consider how collaborating with them could benefit both them and you. Some agencies barter equipment and, occasionally, space. Some are willing to provide services for each others’ participants. Some refer participants to each other. Some even build each other into their budgets.
Be sure to establish inter-agency relationships that are based on trust and candidness. Other agencies are not competitors. They are sources of valuable resources. But these resources will never be shared in the absence of candid and regular communication among administrators.
Finally, budget time for strengthening and building collaborative ties. The process takes time, and collaboration will flourish only if it is assigned a high priority in a program administrator’s weekly schedule.

____________________________________________

This is part of a series of Thumbnail Case Studiesauthored by the FASTEN research team and released by Baylor University School of Social Work as part of a 30-month research project funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts. This project is designed to identify the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in addressing challenges of urban poverty. The Baylor School of Social Work is leading this research team with members from BaylorUniversity’s business school, the schools of social work at the Universityof Pittsburghand VirginiaCommonwealthUniversity, and the Center for Religion and Civic Culture at the Universityof Southern California.

This essay represents some of the findings from the FASTEN research project that are relevant to the planning and delivery of services by faith-based organizations. The piece was authored by John Orr (with the Center for Religion and Civic Culture at the Universityof Southern California) with the FASTEN Research Team. He can be reached at jorr [at] usc [dot] edu.

Related Articles
	Increasing Access to Health Care for the Medically Underserved through Faith

Related Books
	Collaboration: What Makes it Work?
	Collaboration Handbook: Creating, Sustaining and Enjoying the Journey

	News
	Conference Calendar
	Forum
	Find Others
	Ask a Specialist

Religion-Based Employment Discrimination in Charitable Choice: A Guide for the Perplexed

Miki — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:18:38 -0500

RECOMMENDED BOOKS

Religion-Based Employment Discrimination in Charitable Choice: A Guide for the Perplexed

(John Orr, The Center for Religion and Civic Culture, USC)

View Now!

Summary:

Religion-Based Employment Discrimination in Charitable Choice: A Guide for the Perplexed is a short (11-page), readable discussion summarizing the main points of view concerning Charitable Choice's provision that faith-based organizations may use religious criteria in employment decisions.

Why does FASTEN recommend this resource?

This article is good background information on applying the Charitable Choice rules to your organization. It explains the background to the issue, highlights relevant Supreme Court decisions, and points to additional resources for information.

Related Articles
	Toolkit for Government-FBO Collaboration
	Q&A on Legal Issues Involved in FBO-Government Partnerships
	Web Resources for Research and Information Concerning Faith-Based Initiatives and Legal Issues
	Charitable Choice: Top 10 Tips for Public Officials

	News
	Conference Calendar
	Forum
	Find Others
	Ask a Specialist