Skip to Content
 
 
 
Find:
Advanced Search

David R. Pollock Resources

Articles, Blogs, and News

Avoid the Abuse of Memo Use

MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP RESOURCE

Avoid the Abuse of Memo Use

(Adapted from Managing the Staff of the Local Church by David R. Pollock (Alston-Kline, 2003), p. 90-91.)


The ideal communicator prefers to communicate face-to-face whenever possible. But sometimes this scenario isn't possible or practical. You may have a very large group to communicate with; the matter might be of sensitive nature; you may need the information to be documented so it can be easily retrieved in the future. In these circumstances, posting a memo is a necessary alternative to more personal forms of communication.

Tech-savvy nonprofits may rely on internal e-memos as a primary means of speedy, convenient communication. But even under the best of circumstances, with the best of intentions, memos are one-way communication, and so run the risk of being misunderstood.

Before writing a memo, think carefully about the reactions it may cause. Consider your own reason for writing, rather than relaying in person, the information contained in the memo:

    • Are you angry about the issue you intend to address in the memo? Issuing a memo in a fit of anger or frustration can lead to more anger, retaliation and bitterness from your staff. Prepare your attitude to handle the issue properly before sending emotionally charged content.
    • Are you using the memo as a defense mechanism, or as a means of avoiding conflict with an individual or group? Hiding behind impersonal e-mail memos encourages staff members to question your managerial abilities, which in turn can cause distrust and disrespect in your staff.

Form your memo messages within the proper contexts; including pertinent background information in the memo will lessen the possibility of misunderstandings, and eliminate the need for clarification later. For example, rather than posting a memo flatly stating that coffee and tea will no longer be provided gratis by the organization—a decision sure to rile a large percentage of your staff!—you might say:

"In an effort to practice good stewardship, and to use our resources to support our mission and purpose whenever possible, coffee and tea will no longer be provided for the staff use. Instead, the exorbitant funds previously budgeted for these beverages will be routed into our high-risk youth intervention program. Hot water and coffee filters will be available for those of you who choose to bring your own coffee or tea from home."

The best advice when writing memos is to send mission-oriented communication. Ask yourself, "How will this memo help staff members to understand or carry out their appointed tasks? How will the memo improve staff morale? How will it decrease problems we're having in a certain area?" Save impersonal communications for impersonal matters, and take time to look more personal situations in the face.



Related Articles
Support Your Support Staff

Tips for Surviving Workplace Politics

Related Links
Free, On-Line Nonprofit Organization and Management Development Program


News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist


Read more

Support Your Support Staff

MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP RESOURCE

Support Your Support Staff

(Adapted from Managing the Staff of the Local Church by David R. Pollock (Alston-Kline, 2003), p. 91-92.)

Support staff—also known as administrative assistants or secretaries—are indispensable to managers and nonprofit leaders. Because these invaluable staff members are heavily relied upon to carry out all-purpose administrative tasks, they can easily be overworked, under-appreciated and taken advantage of by well-intentioned managers who fail to communicate simple matters with them. Here are some tips for communicating effectively with your support staff.

    • Treat administrative staff members as professionals, not servants.
    • Involve your administrative assistant in daily planning. When assistants aren't involved, they have no control over the workload, which can lead to on-the-job frustration.
    • Let your support staff know where you are and where you're going. If an urgent matter arises, they will know how to reach you. This will also diminish the problem of assistants being accused of being untruthful when they claim not to know where you are.
    • Don't blame your support staff for your mistakes. This unfair action is a sign of your insecurity or incompetence.
    • Communicate priorities so that your assistant doesn't work extra hours on "Project A" when you really needed "Project B" completed right away.
    • Don't wait for Secretary's Day to roll around before thanking your support staff for their hard work and dependability. Acknowledge and appreciate your assistant's efforts frequently.

Good communication is essential to a productive, cooperative nonprofit environment. Keep communication lines open by being available to your staff, and guard against misunderstandings by clearly stating and explaining needs to staff members who directly support you.

 

Related Articles
Four Quick Tips for a Positive Church-Nonprofit Relationship

Motivate Your Staff to be Self-Motivated


News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist


 

Read more

Performance Appraisal: Common Pitfalls and Solutions

 
      MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP RESOURCE

Performance Appraisal: Common Pitfalls and Solutions

(Adapted from Managing the Staff of the Local Church, by David R. Pollock, Alston-Kline, Inc., 2003, p. 19-24. Used with permission.)

Performance appraisal embodies every element of good staff management, and offers a precise way to develop the people working within your organization. The goal is to use performance appraisals as a coaching or development tool—essentially, as a vehicle to inspire communication about work-related issues.

Because performance appraisal ratings involve human judgment, they are subject to human error. Here are some of the common pitfalls of performance appraisal, and how to avoid them.

     1.  Halo Effect

The Problem: A manager or supervisor allows a general favorable impression of an employee to influence his or her judgment on each separate factor in the performance appraisal process.

The Solution: The rater should consider each factor independently of all other factors, rather than rating the employee at the same level on all (or most) factors in an appraisal. No employee’s behavior can be the same on the variety of skills that the rating scales measure.

     2.  Recency Effect

The Problem: A staff member’s recent outstanding contribution or untimely mistake just prior to a performance review colors the manager’s perception of the employee’s performance for the entire appraisal period. (A similar pitfall, the Unforgettable Effect, occurs when an employee does something so extraordinary, either positively or negatively, that its impressions last for a long time, to the advantage or disadvantage of the employee.)

The Solution: An alert manager compensates for lack of perspective by careful documentation.

     3.  Manager Preference

The Problem: Personal friends of managers get better ratings than their performance justifies. Conversely, managers rate employees lower than they deserve when conflicts of manner, style and personality exist.

The Solution: Managers avoid the tendency to rate favored employees higher than they deserve because of their manner and personality.

     4.  Effect of Past Record

The Problem: The employee who has performed well in the distant past is assumed to be acceptable in the recent past also. Previous good work tends to carry over into the new period being appraised.

The Solution: Once again, observation and documentation of the employee’s performance will give an accurate account of the performance period under scrutiny.

  5.  Leniency Effect

The Problem: A manager tends to rate everyone high. This error is usually committed when managers feel uncomfortable about communicating negative feedback or do not want to hurt the employee’s feelings. (A related problem, the Central Tendency, occurs when a manager rates all employees as average by choosing the middle rating. The Central Tendency is perhaps the most serious error of all; it closes the door to an employee’s growth and improvement on a job, because no strengths or weaknesses are identified.)

The Solution: Understanding the constructive purposes of performance appraisal and acquiring effective skills in giving negative feedback should reduce the tendency to commit this error.

     6.  Carelessness

The Problem: Managers make quick guesses based on first impressions of an employee’s performance.

The Solution: Managers commit significant time to observing staff members and forming judgments based on their observations. Major decisions are often based on performance rating, and ill-considered ratings will contribute unreliable information and detract from the organization’s goals.

     7.  Irrelevant (and Illegal) Standards

The Problem: Evaluations are dependent on the rater’s personal preferences, prejudices and biases. The rater who has a biased or prejudiced attitude toward certain groups of people looks for behavior in these groups that confirms his or her prejudices.

The Solution: When rating employees, the manager must consider the same relevant behaviors for all employees supervised. Social status, race, sex, age or other non-performance factors should not affect performance appraisal ratings. Careful observation, description and documentation of actual performance on an ongoing basis reduce the tendency for bias by emphasizing job performance over a period of time.


Related Articles
Support Your Support Staff

Delegation: Reasons and Rules

Job Satisfaction Survey

Related Links
Nonprofit Good Practice Guide


News
Conference Calendar
Forum
Find Others
Ask a Specialist
Read more
TechMission Corps City Vision College ChristianVolunteering.org